NGO News, Latest NGO News, Fund for NGO, NGO News Update » Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https://ngonewsbd.com Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:15:06 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol https://ngonewsbd.com/revised-supplementary-methods-and-good-practice-guidance-arising-from-the-kyoto-protocol/ https://ngonewsbd.com/revised-supplementary-methods-and-good-practice-guidance-arising-from-the-kyoto-protocol/#comments Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:13:16 +0000 admin https://ngonewsbd.com/?p=196 >>> Read More >>>]]> IPCC

NGO News Desk :: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is calling for experts to review the first order draft of its 2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol to be finalized at the end of October 2013. At its 35th  plenary session held in Geneva, Switzerland, in June 2012, the IPCC asked its Task
Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI) to review and update its supplementary guidance on greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) for reporting under the Kyoto Protocol. The decision was in response to an invitation by Parties to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Parties to the Kyoto Protocol asked the IPCC to review and if necessary update its Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF issued in 2003 to ensure consistency with decisions agreed by the UNFCCC in Durban at the end of 2011. Climate policy and global climate negotiations rely on a robust scientific foundation to produce sound results. The IPCC provides policymakers with regular assessments of climate science and its potential impacts, and assessments of the possibilities for mitigating climate change. The estimation of emissions and removals of greenhouse gases is one important basis for climate mitigation. The IPCC provides de facto international standards for such estimation, through highly technical work, while offering flexibility to take different national circumstances and capacities into account.  Review is an important part of the IPCC assessment process. Draft reports are subjected to a multistage review beginning with the review
of a first order draft by scientific experts, followed by the review of a second order draft by governments and experts and a final round of government comments prior to the approval session of the Panel. The IPCC seeks as broad a range of experts as possible, based on a self-declaration of expertise. Once
registered, expert reviewers will be provided with the drafts that are confidential documents not to be cited, quoted or distributed.  The drafts, comments and responses are made public after the report or guidance is finalized. Experts interested in taking part in this first review process can register here: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/forms/kpsgreview_registration.html.  Registration is open until the end of the review period on 3 February 2013.

]]>
https://ngonewsbd.com/revised-supplementary-methods-and-good-practice-guidance-arising-from-the-kyoto-protocol/feed/ 0
IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report Published https://ngonewsbd.com/ipccs-fifth-assessment-report-published/ https://ngonewsbd.com/ipccs-fifth-assessment-report-published/#comments Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:37:31 +0000 admin https://ngonewsbd.com/?p=61 >>> Read More >>>]]> IPCC Staff Correspondent :: The Second Order Draft of the Working Group I contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (WGI AR5) has been made available online. The IPCC regrets this unauthorized posting which interferes with the process of assessment and review. We will continue
not to comment on the contents of draft reports, as they are works in progress.
The Expert and Government Review of the WGI AR5 was held for an 8-week period ending on 30
November 2012. A total of 31,422 comments was submitted by 800 experts and 26 governments on
the Second Order Draft of the Chapters and the First Order Draft of the Summary for Policymakers
and Technical Summary. The author teams together with the Review Editors are now considering
these comments and will meet at the Working Group I Fourth Lead Author Meeting on 13-19 January
2013 in Hobart, Tasmania, to respond to all the comments received during the Expert and
Government Review.
The IPCC is committed to an open and transparent process that delivers a robust assessment. That is
why IPCC reports go through multiple rounds of review and the Working Groups encourage reviews
from as broad a range of experts as possible, based on a self-declaration of expertise. All comments
submitted in the review period are considered by the authors in preparing the next draft and a
response is made to every comment. After a report is finalized, all drafts submitted for formal review,
the review comments, and the responses by authors to the comments are made available on the
IPCC and Working Group websites along with the final report. These procedures were decided by the
IPCC’s member governments.
The unauthorized and premature posting of the drafts of the WGI AR5, which are works in progress,
may lead to confusion because the text will necessarily change in some respects once all the review
comments have been addressed. It should also be noted that the cut-off date for peer-reviewed
published literature to be included and assessed in the final draft lies in the future (15 March 2013).
The text that has been posted is thus not the final report.
This is why the IPCC drafts are not made public before the final document is approved. These drafts
were provided in confidence to reviewers and are not for distribution. It is regrettable that one out of
many hundreds of reviewers broke the terms of the review and posted the drafts of the WGI AR5.
Each page of the draft makes it clear that drafts are not to be cited, quoted or distributed and we
would ask for this to continue to be respected.
]]>
https://ngonewsbd.com/ipccs-fifth-assessment-report-published/feed/ 0