Chair of the Least Developed Countries (LDC) Group, Gebru Jember Endalew, said “climate change is costing lives and livelihoods, particularly in poor and vulnerable countries so there is a need for urgent action by all countries. The LDC Group will continue to push for fair and ambitious action by all.”

“For many of our countries, keeping the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius is a matter of survival. Therefore, we all have to work towards a cleaner, greener, low-carbon global society as soon as possible.”

“Protecting people, livelihoods and economies also requires adapting to the impacts of climate change that are already devastating communities, erasing hard-won development gains and forcing mass migration. In this regard, I am deeply concerned about the lack of available support for adaptation, leaving the poorest and most vulnerable in society to weather the worst impacts of climate change with the least means to cope. Meanwhile the Least Developed Countries Fund, a key source of support for adaptation planning and implementation, sits empty.”

“Many LDCs have made ambitious commitments under the Paris Agreement. However, these commitments cannot be implemented without substantial support, including technological and financial support. Many estimates suggest that more than $100 trillion is needed to transition to a global low-carbon society. The financial support committed by developing countries to date falls far short of this figure and is therefore woefully inadequate. The little that has nominally been made available through various funds and institutions continues to be inaccessible for our countries that the lack individual and institutional capacity to readily access those funds. In short, climate finance must begin to actually flow to the countries that need it and be scaled up drastically if we are to limit global warming to safe levels and avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change across the globe.”

“Despite the challenges LDCs face, we are leading through action, for example by building on the successful launch of the LDC Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Initiative at COP22. Through this initiative, LDCs are taking charge of their energy future and security and empowering our poorest communities to pursue sustainable development through equitable access to clean, sustainable and low-carbon energy.”

The LDC Group has already convened in Bonn for preparatory meetings from 1-2 May, to consolidate our positions and strategies ahead of the upcoming negotiations.

Significant pollution cuts and the transfer of finance and technology are needed in order to limit global warming to well below 1.5C, the limit identified by many scientists and social movements across the world.

The post Climate change negotiations in Bonn appeared first on NGO News, Latest NGO News, Fund for NGO, NGO News Update.

The Urban Climate Change Research Network organised the event in collaboration with the Bangladesh Environment Network and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

Bangladesh, located at the northern tip of the Bay of Bengal, is one of the world’s most at-risk countries for severe coastal storms. With much of its land area at or only several feet above sea level, it is particularly vulnerable to destructive tropical cyclones or hurricanes.  In response, the people of Bangladesh have adapted their homes, villages, wells, and crops to cope with frequent flooding. Locally and nationally, governments have also put in place “preparedness committees”, chains of communication, and a National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) to minimize the country’s exposure to disaster risk.

In light of Bangladesh’s experience with planning for and adapting to catastrophic floods, this Dr Saleemul Huq shared the lessons learned in building climate and disaster resilience in coastal cities. Other environmental experts from Bangladesh (Mizan Khan) and New York City (Dr Cynthia Rosenzweig) shared their knowledge and discussing how these lessons can be applied to New York City. Biographies of all three speakers follow these notes on their talks, which Gary Monitz wrote during the event.

Coping with Cyclones in Bangladesh: Lessons for New York (Dr Saleemul Huq)

Dr Huq opened by discussing how climate change is a global problem and there is much mutual learning that can be done between countries. In many ways, there is more to learn from the poorer countries than can be learned from the more developed countries. Experiences from developing countries around the world, Bangladesh being an example, can be shared to our mutual benefit. In the case of climate change vulnerability, impacts and adaptation, Bangladesh is leading the way and has much knowledge to share with vulnerable cities and locations like New York.

Dr Huq continued on with a historical overview of tropical cyclones on Bangladesh. The main point here was that the death toll from cyclones in Bangladesh has decreased significantly over time as a result of numerous adaptation strategies that have been implemented over the years. Engineered barriers such as polders and coastal embankments have helped to protect against storm surge and flooding since the 1960s and 1970s, although many are now in poor condition and at risk of being overtopped by storm surge and flooding. An early warning system (Bangladesh cyclone preparedness program) utilizes over 5000 volunteers to make people aware of oncoming cyclones. Bangladesh has been encouraging a “people-centered” early warning system in which people are no longer “vulnerable”, but rather capable, resilient and able to protect themselves.

Emergency cyclone shelters have been built for people to evacuate to, although the capacity of these shelters still needs to be increased. Many of the emergency shelters also serve other functions such as schools and have the ability to store livestock and water. Another adaptive measure being undertaken is to increase the effectiveness of natural vegetation as a storm barrier. This has often involved what Dr Huq refers to as “social forestry”, where the people plant trees and mangroves themselves to act as storm buffers. Another method employed has been the development of floating gardens, or “bairas” that can withstand floods. Finally, Bangladesh has implemented successful programs to increase the awareness of climate change and cyclone risk amongst the most vulnerable populations.

Dr Huq went on to discuss the impacts of climate change on Bangladesh. Similar to what is expected for New York City and the U.S. East Coast, the likelihood of extreme events is expected to increase (a greater number of storms with higher winds and rainfall rates), although a decrease or no change in overall cyclone frequency is expected. Although adaption measures are expected to continue to be successful in reducing loss of life, the economic losses from cyclones is expected to increase. Dr Huq estimates that the equivalent of about US$5 billion in adaptation costs will be required to protect economic assets.

The key lessons from the first part of Dr Huq’s discussion is that technology and engineering can play a large role in adapting to the impacts of climate change, but it cannot solve the problem by itself. Investment in human and community knowledge, awareness and capacity is also necessary. Special attention and priority must be given to the most vulnerable in a society. Focus should be on empowering people and helping them to deal with disasters on their own, rather than treating them as victims. Taking adaptive measures in advance is a more cost-effective way to cope with disasters.

The latter part of Dr Huq’s talk centered on the Action Research for Community Adaptation in Bangladesh (ARCAB) program. ARCAB is a long-term action research program that will work at sites across Bangladesh with the goal of researching knowledge and actions for adaptation at the community level in order to support the development of climate resilient communities. Researchers on the project gather data from 20 research stations in different local communities across the country, located in different ecosystems. Action partners for the project include 11 international NGOs working on CBA. Research partners for the project are divided into three tiers: 1) national academic institutions which employ graduate students to conduct research at the field sites, 2) national research institutions with particular sectoral expertise, and 3) international universities and institutions. ARCAB aims to use rigorous research to develop proven community-based adaptation strategies that can be scaled up and replicated in many locations.

Comments from Dr Mizan Khan

“There is no option but to be prepared, which will require a greater investment in disaster risk reduction. In the US, climate change is rarely or almost never mentioned in politics or government reports, what are American leaders afraid of? What will convince American leaders to accept the truth about climate change? More than two-thirds of the American public accepts that climate change is happening, so why do politicians continue to do so little about it? There needs to be more empowerment from the people. The change is not long-term, it’s happening now and we can no longer afford to sit back and not do anything about it.”

Hurricane Sandy-Role of Science in Forecasting Impacts (Dr Cynthia Rosenzweig)

In her talk, Dr  Rosenzweig evaluated the effectiveness of New York City’s preparation for, and response to Superstorm Sandy. One day prior to Sandy’s arrival, the city issued a mandatory evacuation of coastal Flood Zone A. The evacuation did help to prevent some loss of life, although there is still a significant amount of criticism about how the city handled the evacuation. Sandy claimed over 200 lives in total, over 100 of which were in the United States and 43 of which were in New York City.  Over 4 million people in the metropolitan area lost power, which was the most widespread outage this area has ever seen. Utility companies were simply unprepared to handle such a massive outage in a timely manner, leaving some people without power for weeks.

Dr  Rosenzweig went on to discuss the links between Sandy and climate change. The 1 foot of sea level rise which has occurred in New York Harbor over the past 100 years exacerbated the storm surge flooding in many low-lying areas. Coastal flooding is projected to occur more frequently and with greater intensity in the future. In addition, an increase in hurricane intensity and the frequency of more intense hurricanes is expected. Another possible connection which may have influenced the path of Sandy is changing jet stream patterns, possibly associated with melting Arctic sea ice, which may cause storms to turn westward more frequently. However, this is still an area of active research and is not clearly understood at this point.

The city had taken several preventative actions prior to Sandy. The MTA was in the process of enhancing existing programs and had also conducted a pilot project to raise subway air vents on the sidewalk. Planning/engineering programs already in place included the NYC DEP Climate Change Integrated Modeling Project (CCMIP) analyzing impacts on water supply as well as various DEP studies on the impacts of rising sea levels on Wastewater Pollution Control Plants, tide gates and other structures. The New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC) has recommended an update to the 100-year floodplain to include more vulnerable areas. Dr  Rosenzweig also discussed the role of urban design in creating a future city that is vibrant, sustainable, and can deal with future storms.

Dr  Rosenzweig concluded her talk with a discussion of the overall role of cities in fostering climate change adaptation. Cities are universally connected through a variety of flows. The role of cities in this regard has been strengthening as they emerge as first responders for both adaptation and mitigation. Concrete actions going on amongst cities include prototype mitigation and adaptation standards, common sets of standards for reporting, and engaging citizens in a bottom-up approach, especially from the poorest and most vulnerable people already suffering the most from the impacts of climate change. We should use Sandy as a tipping point to incorporate the discussion of climate change into all of our actions.

SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES

Dr Saleemul Huq is a Senior Fellow at the International Institute for Environment & Development (IIED) and the Director of the International Centre for Climate Change & Development (ICCCAD) at the Independent University in Dhaka. His expertise is in the inter-linkages between climate change (both mitigation as well as adaptation) and sustainable development from the perspective of developing countries with special emphasis on the least developed countries (LDCs). He is the Chairman of the Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh , which is the major non-government research and policy institute working on environment and development related issues in Bangladesh . He is a leading environmental planner at national and international level having worked for numerous international agencies on global environmental issues. He has advised national government planners and international funding agencies on environment and climate change programmes. He is also on the steering committee of UCCRN.

Dr  Cynthia Rosenzweig is a Senior Research Scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, where she heads the Climate Impacts Group. She recently co-chaired the New York City Panel on Climate Change, a body of experts convened by the Mayor to advise the city on adaptation for its critical infrastructure. She co-led the Metropolitan East Coast Regional Assessment, sponsored by the U.S. Global Change Research Program. She was a Coordinating Lead Author of the IPCC Working Group II Fourth Assessment Report, and is also Co-Editor of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN) First Assessment Report on Climate Change and Cities (ARC3), the first-ever global, interdisciplinary, cross-regional, science-based assessment to address climate risks, adaptation, mitigation, and policy mechanisms relevant to cities. A recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship, she joins impact models with climate models to project future outcomes of both land-based and urban systems under altered climate conditions.

Dr Mizan R. Khan is a professor at the Department of Environmental Science and Management (DESM) at North South University (NSU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Currently, he is a visiting scholar at Brown University in Providence, RI. He is also an adjunct professor at the Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Khan is a lead author of the Working Group III of the IPCC. He has also served as Research Director at the Bangladesh Institute of International & Strategic Studies (BIISS), Dhaka, and as UNDP Environment Policy Specialist, working with the Government of Bangladesh, and a senior researcher at the Centre for International Development and Conflict Management (CIDCM) at the University of Maryland at College Park. He was vice chair of the LDC Expert Group under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and has attended the climate negotiations as a member of the Bangladesh delegation since 2001. Professor Khan is the focal point of the Nairobi Work Program of the UNFCCC, representing Academia in Bangladesh. He is working as project director of a 6-year CIDA-funded Partnership Project with the University of Manitoba, Canada, on “Building Environmental Governance Capacity in Bangladesh.”

The post Lessons from Bangladesh for a post-Sandy New York appeared first on NGO News, Latest NGO News, Fund for NGO, NGO News Update.

NGO News Desk :: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is calling for experts to review the first order draft of its 2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol to be finalized at the end of October 2013. At its 35th  plenary session held in Geneva, Switzerland, in June 2012, the IPCC asked its Task
Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI) to review and update its supplementary guidance on greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) for reporting under the Kyoto Protocol. The decision was in response to an invitation by Parties to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Parties to the Kyoto Protocol asked the IPCC to review and if necessary update its Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF issued in 2003 to ensure consistency with decisions agreed by the UNFCCC in Durban at the end of 2011. Climate policy and global climate negotiations rely on a robust scientific foundation to produce sound results. The IPCC provides policymakers with regular assessments of climate science and its potential impacts, and assessments of the possibilities for mitigating climate change. The estimation of emissions and removals of greenhouse gases is one important basis for climate mitigation. The IPCC provides de facto international standards for such estimation, through highly technical work, while offering flexibility to take different national circumstances and capacities into account.  Review is an important part of the IPCC assessment process. Draft reports are subjected to a multistage review beginning with the review
of a first order draft by scientific experts, followed by the review of a second order draft by governments and experts and a final round of government comments prior to the approval session of the Panel. The IPCC seeks as broad a range of experts as possible, based on a self-declaration of expertise. Once
registered, expert reviewers will be provided with the drafts that are confidential documents not to be cited, quoted or distributed.  The drafts, comments and responses are made public after the report or guidance is finalized. Experts interested in taking part in this first review process can register here: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/forms/kpsgreview_registration.html.  Registration is open until the end of the review period on 3 February 2013.

The post Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol appeared first on NGO News, Latest NGO News, Fund for NGO, NGO News Update.